Justia Lawyer Rating
badge - Top 100 Trial Lawyers, The National Trial Lawyers
badge - Lead Counsel Rated
badge - Avvo Rating 10, Gregory J. Brod, Top attorney
badge - American Bar Association
badge - Member of San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association
badge - Super Lawyers

|

According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Williams-Sonoma is recalling hot chocolate pots, which were sold nationwide, online at www.williams-sonoma.com, and through Williams –Sonoma catalogs from October 2010 through January 2011, for about $30-$40. The recalled product was manufactured in China and imported by ICI USA, LLC of Seattle, Washington. There have been 28 reported incidents of handles breaking off the posts, in addition to eight reported incidents of injuries involving minor cuts or burns. Around 28,000 hot chocolate pots were recalled in the United States and 700 have been recalled in Canada. Specifically, the product involved is the Whirly Whip hot chocolate pots, item number 2981454 or 4986535. They were also sold as part of gift set, item number 3021714. The item number is located on the box in which the product is sold, just below the bar code. The pot is white porcelain, has a red handle and red knob, and comes with a frother attached under the knob’s lid. Consumers are advised to stop using the recalled hot chocolate pots, immediately, and they are advised to return the product to any Williams-Sonoma store for a full refund.

Every year thousands of people are injured from using defective products. Often, defective products are the cause of serious or deadly injuries. Many products are recalled because they pose dangerous burn related risks for consumers. When a person is burned by a dangerous product, he or she may be able to pursue a product liability action against the seller or manufacturer of the product. If a person did not buy the dangerous product and was injured by it, such as an innocent bystander or a person who borrowed the dangerous product from a friend and used it, they may also be able to file a claim. A product liability claim can be filed against the manufacturer of the product, as well as the supplier, distributor or retailer of the product. Manufacturers and sellers of dangerous goods can be sued for negligence, and sometimes proof of negligence is not necessary under the rule of strict liability. If you have questions regarding a potential claim and whether or not you may be able to recover damages, please contact our firm.

|

Despite the statistics showing air travel to be one of the safest modes of transportation, air travel is not a risk free mode of tranportation. In fact, as air travel increases, the risk of an aviation accident also increases. It is worth pointing out that aviation accidents actually occur more frequently than publicized, though many are minor and don’t result in injuries. At the same time, however, aviation accidents can sometimes result in serious injuries, or even the dealths of hundreds of passengers, especially after impact with a body of water or treacherous landscape.

Just today, the government has decided to order emergency checks of certain older model Boeing Co. 797s for the kind of fatigue cracks that prompted Southwest Airlines Co. to cancel hundreds of flights after one of them made an emergency landing last Friday due to a hoe in its fuselage. The order will cover 175 planes worldwide. Most of the planes that need checks are in the United States and flown by Southwest. Thankfully the incident did not lead to a serious accident. The plane was able to land in one piece with no injuries reported. If that Southwest flight had ended catastrophically, figuring out the liable parties would have been an extremely challenging job.

Determining responsibility after an aviation accident is usually a complex process, involving numerous parties, such as the pilot, air traffic controllers, equipment manufacturers, and so on. As a result, all civil aviation accidents are investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board, an independent agency responsible for investigating aviation accidents and publishing reports based on its findings. Depending on the cause of the accident, the liable party could include the owner operator of the airplane, the manufacturer, the parts or maintenance suppliers, or the federal government. When the government is liable for aviation accidents, it is subject to special rules and regulations. However, most aviation accidents are subject to general aviation law as determined by state and federal authorities, regardless of responsibility.

Continue Reading ›

|

According to the American Bar, employers must comply with federal and state wage and hour law, period. What is more, they should know that they will not be able to avoid being held liable by pretending not to know-and they could incur more liability for “willful” violations if they do. So, if an employer violates wage and hour law through its work place rules, it can generally be proven by facts, regardless of any change to company policy. Employees and former employees may seek wage and hour relief through various vehicles which provide group relief. The most common is through a class action relief or equivalent class relief under local jurisdiction laws and rules.

Another type of relief, collective action relief, may be sought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Generally speaking, the courts follow two phases when they consider collective actions under the FLSA. In the first phase they examine the pleadings and submission of the proposed collective action and decide whether the proposed class members are similarly situated. If that is the case, then they may conditionally certify the class. Then, putative class member are given notice and the opportunity to “opt in.” Through the discovery process the action proceeds as a representative action. The second phase of an FLSA collective action inquiry takes place after discovery is mostly complete, and this next phase is usually based on a motion for “decertification” by the defendant. At that time an extensive analysis is conducted to determine whether the employees are sufficiently similarly situated to continue to proceed as a class. If the claimants are not similarly situated, then the class is decertified. Then the opt-in plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice, and the class representatives proceed to trial on their individual claims.

Lastly, governmental agencies, such as The Department of Labor (DOL) or similar state agencies, have statutory authority to pursue damages and/or injunctive relief directly against an employer. The DOL can also pursue group remedies. For more information about class action law, or if you would like a free consultation regarding a potential class action case, please contact our firm. We have over 10 years experience fighting for injured parties in personal injury cases, and we can help you evaluate whether you have a claim as individual or as part of a class. Contact us for a free consultation today.

|

A man washing windows at a Huntington Beach medical office building was electrocuted this morning when he accidentally touched over power lines with a metal pole, according to the LATimes. The man was using a brush on a long extension pole with a water hose attachment to clean the windows of a three-story building on the 17700 block of Beach Boulevard about 6:30am. He was trying to work around a tree when the pole came in contact with the power line. He was immediately electrocuted and died on the spot. Fire fighters found the man’s body on the sidewalk—his clothes were burned.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupation Injuries, electrocution is the fifth leading cause of occupational injury death in the United states, and a particular hazard to those whose work routinely brings them into close proximity to electrical sources. The highest proportions of fatal occupational electrocutions have occurred among those employed in the electrical trades and among utility workers and those employed in the construction and manufacturing industries. Contact with overhead power lines is reportedly by far the most frequent cause of fatal electrocution injury. A significant number of fatal electrocutions occurred during constructing, repairing, cleaning, and inspecting, or painting activities, the majority of which occurred at industrial places and premises.

Electrocution continues to be a significant cause of occupation death. All work sites should have proper warnings of hazards, safety equipment, and supervision, but, sadly, these necessities are often overlooked and workers are put at risk, leaving them vulnerable to serious and tragic accidents. When a work site fails to provide personnel with a hazard-free workplace and fails to meet the safety requirements enforced by OSHA, or any other safety regulatory committee with jurisdiction, serious injuries and deaths may occur. In such cases, the business owners, general contractors, subcontractors, and equipment or material suppliers may be held liable. After these types of accidents occur, the injured party should immediately contact an experienced Bay Area Work Site Accident Attorney. If you or a loved suffered an injury due to an accident at job site, please contact our office today. We have over 10 years experience fighting for the victims of job site accidents, and winning them the compensation they deserve.

|

Last week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that two different companies issued food product recalls after epidemiologic investigations linked Salmonella Panama infections to specific cantaloupe shipments from Del Monte Fresh Produce and E coli O157;H7 infections to Lebanon bologna manufactured by Palmyra Bologna Company. They received reports that 12 patients in four states-Oregon (5 cases), Washington (4 cases), California (2 cases), and Maryland (1 case)–fell ill as a result of Salmonella Panama. According to investigations, all but one of the ill patients ate cantaloupe in the week prior to falling ill and all 10 ate cantaloupe purchased at seven separate Costco locations. The other 14 infections connected to the E. coli outbreak involved patients from five states-Maryland (3 cases), New Jersey (2 cases), North Carolina (1 case), Ohio (2 cases), and Pennsylvania (6 cases)-as of March 22, 20011. The bologna recall was categorized as a Class I, which means it represents a health hazard situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of the defective product will cause serious, adverse health consequences or death.

Both Salmonella and E coli cause abdominal cramps and diarrhea-in some cases the symptoms may be so severe that the patient needs to be hospitalized. The elderly, infirm, infants, and those with impaired immune systems are more likely to develope a severe illness from these infections. Anyone who thinks they may have become ill from eating possibly contaminated food should consult their health care provider. If you or a loved one became ill due to eating tainted food, contact our food safety attorney today. We have over 10 experience helping victims of defective or contaminated products win the compensation they deserve.

|

Last Friday, a driver of a crane truck on 2nd Street and Townsend struck a 72-year-old woman walking in the crosswalk, according to streetsblog.org. The accident occurred at 8:58am in front of San Francisco Fire Department’s headquarters, and even though multiple emergency medical technicians were on the scene immediately after the woman was struck, they were unable to save her life. The truck that struck her belongs to Sheedy Drayage Company, but there is no available information about the driver yet. Lt. Mindy Talmadge, San Francisco Fire Department’s spokesperson, said that the driver of the crane truck is extremely distraught. No one was placed in custody or under arrest at the time of the accident, as the matter remained under investigation. Ultimately, as in any case such as this, it will be up to the district attorney if any charges are filed. Already three seniors have died on San Francisco’s street this year– unfortunate events that should prompt the city to get going on pedestrian safety improvements.

Truck accident litigation is complex. When a commercial truck is involved in an accident that results in injury or death, a number of issues must be taken into consideration in order to determine the possible liable parties for an accident. For instance, if a distracted or drowsy driving were a factor, both the truck driver and their employer could be held liable for the results of the injury accident. At the same time, however, other issues may have also been factors that may not have been known at the time of the accident. Typically, under these circumstances, a third party investigation is conducted in to find other possible causes for the accident so that the liable parties can be discovered and held accountable for their negligent behavior. Under Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, a trucking company is responsible for just about every act of their truck drivers. To determine who is responsible, it is important to retain the representation of an experienced injury accident attorney. Here at the Brod Law Firm, we have over 10 years experience handling injury accident claims arising from collisions involving different types of vehicles. If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to a collision with a truck, please contact our firm today.

|

Two recent organic food recalls prove that organic does not mean pathogen free. According to theUSDA, First Class Foods, of Hawthorne, California issued a recall of 34,373 pounds of organic beef over potential contamination with E. coli bacteria on December 30th of last year. That beef was distributed in California, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Washington State, and Wisconsin, and was sold under the Organic Harvest and Nature’s Harvest label. At that time, according to the FDA, Tiny Greens Organic Farm also recalled alfalfa and spicy sprouts over concerns of potential contamination with the Salmonella pathogen. Those sprouts were distributed in Illinois, Indiana, and Missouri. July of last year, a recall was initiated by Specialty Farms regarding a possible Listeria contamination of their sprouts. Organicgirls also issued a recall over concerns of Salmonella contamination last year.

Organics is big business, generating billions in sales every year. However, the agency that oversees the certifying process is underfunded and understaffed, and agents have an incentive to approve companies that are paying them. Before, organic labeling didn’t mean much when it came to processed food in packages (many packaged foods have a few orgainic are not 100% organic), but now fresh organic food is just as suspect. The truth is that we take a risk every time we eat something, organic or not, as pathogens can enter the food chain at time. Consumers should remember that pesticide free does not mean pathogen free. At the same time, we should be able to expect stricter adherence to cleanliness and quality when we pay the higher price for organics. Yet, as the recalls prove, it is folly to expect–and believe– the people and companies that sell such products are of the same philosophy. Also, funnily enough, we tend believe, on some unconscious level, that the higher price of organics should keep us safe and healthy. But the truth is it does not ensure safety. So, the real issues and concerns are over who inspects, processes, and handles our food, and those standards are coming under pressure from the public as big companies cash in on the growing demand for organic foods. Here at the Brod Law Firm, we encourage consumers to update their understanding the hierarchy of organic labeling and become proactive about their purchases by asking where their products come from and how fresh they are, etc.etc. If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to ingesting a contaminated product, contact our office for a free consultation.

|

According to the New York of Times, New York State is the operator of 2,000 group homes, which means that the state is responsible to care and protect about 10,000 residents with severe physical and mental disabilities. The Times claims the state is not doing its job and that group home abuse is running rampant. The conditions were documented by the New York Times and are described as appalling, and they are representative of the worst scandal Albany has seen in recent times. For example, a supervisor in an upstate home was discovered sexually abusing disabled female patient. Even though he was arrested and charged with rape, he was never fired. Improper screening for criminal backgrounds, drug abuse or psychological fitness, as we have been saying for a while, is to blame for lack of action by different groups that are supposed to help ensure quality care for the elderly and handicapped, such as the Office for People with Developmental Disabilities and the Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities.

Several cases of elder abuse across the country have led to nursing and group home probes, lawsuits, and closures. There is no question that caring for the elderly is extremely stressful. But the problems begin when care workers, many of whom have inadequate training, abuse patients and then blame everyone else for their troubles. In addition to that most homes are understaffed and supervisors do not stay beyond the regular workweek hours. And sometimes employees are warned to keep quiet about episodes in order to avoid governmental investigations, which make it nearly impossible to bring change to the dysfunctional culture of abuse or hold individuals accountable.

If you or loved one suffered abuse at nursing home or other elder care facility, please contact our office for a free consultation. We have over 10 years experience aggressively handling, trying, and winning elder abuse cases.

|

According to SFWeekly, a speeding driver suffering from a bout of road rage beat a woman and her boyfriend walking through the Excelsior neighborhood earlier this week. Early that morning, the couple was walking across the street at Persia Avenue and Madrid Street when a driver speeding in a green car sped passed them. The woman looked at the driver and yelled out “whoa.” Then the driver made a U-turn, stopped the car, got out, and started beating the woman. The passenger of the car also jumped in on the attack and began punching the woman. The victim’s boyfriend tried to help her, but the men punched him and broke his nose. Both suspects got back into the car and sped off. But the best part of the story is what happened next, an incident of sweet justice that underlines the fact that many criminals are not so smart: one of the men left his driver’s license and DMV papers on the street where the beating occurred. Amazingly, at that moment, the couple still had their wits about them, and they were able to grab the papers and call the police, who were able to broadcast the name of one of the suspects. Both men were quickly found and arrested. The cops described the incident as “the best arrest of the day.”

The inability to handle anger, and/or deflect it, is usually the major factor behind road rage. More often than not, the typical road rager may be violent in other parts of his or her life, and exhibit one or all of the following personality traits—selfish, addicted to power, angry, and vindictive. But sometimes just the tension of a daily commute can turn a normally calm person into a road rager. Whatever the case may be, it is obvious that there is a need for anger management on the roads so that fewer drivers and pedestrians are victimized. Here at the Brod Law Firm, we heard many stories of car accidents that were either the direct or indirect result of road rage. If you or loved one suffered an injury due to a car accident, contact our firm for a free consultation today.

|

According to the San Jose Mercury News, three former nursing home workers have been charged over allegations that one abused an elderly resident, while the other two did nothing to stop it. Officials with the California Department of Justice says agents on Wednesday arrested 27-year-old Arnold Samson on suspicion of committing elder abuse and battery against a resident at the Idylwood Care Center in Sunnyvale. The other two, 22-year-old Ryan Tan and 50-year-old Ricardo Martinez were also arrested. Authorities say they knew about alleged abuse, but failed to report it, as required by law. Idylwood spokesman Larry Kamer told the reporters that the three no longer worked at the center. All of the charges are misdemeanors.
In January agents from the state Bureau of Medi-Cal fraud and Elder Abuse received an allegation of sexual misconduct from the Department of Public Health’s Licensing and Certification Division. A staff member reported that one of the Idylwood residents was complaining to him about being grabbed in the “private area” over several days by one of the certified nursing assistants. As the employee was in the process of questioning the resident, he said he saw Samson grab the resident’s genitalia and make a crude comment. The employee reported the abuse immediately and Samson was suspended. A news release from the state department stated several members, whom agents interviewed, said Samson had grabbed and pulled on the testicles of the same resident and made crude comments on other occasions as well as threatened to touch resident’s private parts in an attempt to torment him. In an interview with agents, Tan allegedly admitted that he had seen Samson threaten the resident several times. Tan also allegedly told agents that he watched Samson grab the man’s private parts while the resident was sleeping “in order to get a rise out of him.”
Here at the Brod Law Firm we agree with what Kamala Harris said in a statement regarding the matter: “As a mandated reporter, caregivers are bound by law to report anyone they see commit abuse or are told an abuse has occurred. We want to send a clear message to facility caregivers around the state that if you fail to report abuse, we will come after you.” If you or a loved were suffered abuse at a nursing home facility, please contact our firm for a free consultation.

Contact Information
San Francisco, CA
100 Pine St #1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Toll Free: (800) 427-7020Phone: (415) 397-1130
Los Angeles, CA
11150 W Olympic Blvd #1050
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Toll Free: (800) 427-7020
Petaluma, CA
17 Keller St
Petaluma, CA 94952
Toll Free: (800) 427-7020Phone: (707) 238-8999

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Brod Law Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design