Justia Lawyer Rating
badge - Top 100 Trial Lawyers, The National Trial Lawyers
badge - Lead Counsel Rated
badge - Avvo Rating 10, Gregory J. Brod, Top attorney
badge - American Bar Association
badge - Member of San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association
badge - Super Lawyers

As lawyers for small businesses in San Francisco and the surrounding region, the Brod Law Firm knows that the vast majority of local business operators follow the law. We also know that most business owners want their organization to be open and accessible to all customers, including those with disabilities. A recent series of articles in the San Francisco Chronicle highlights the fact that even these businesses can become the target of “opportunistic” suits under the Americans with Disability Act (“the ADA”) and related state and local policies.

We can help your San Francisco business with ADA claims. Having spent countless hours in courtrooms, we know that preventing lawsuits is always preferable to trial. As is highlighted in the recent Chronicle series, there are many resources available to California businesses to help them comply with all legal obligations. The City of San Francisco has a specialized Office of Small Business that provides a lot of information to help business owners and management personnel comply with the law. With respect to the ADA, businesses must ensure their facility is accessible to all customers by removing any existing architectural barriers and by following accessibility codes for any construction. If your business is undertaking construction efforts, consulting a Certified Access Specialist is recommended. These experts can provide feedback during the process. Furthermore, an inspection report is very useful if a lawsuit arises, creating a 90-day stay on a lawsuit and providing for an Early Evaluation Conference that can help eliminate meritless claims without the need for a full trial. Tax incentives exist to help businesses with the cost of ADA compliance.

Unfortunately, even businesses that have been proactive in complying with the ADA will sometimes face legal complaints. If you receive a verbal or written complaint alleging that your business has violated the ADA, it is vital that you seek the assistance of a Northern California small business attorney immediately. Early representation can help you avoid missing any deadlines and can help you achieve a timely, positive resolution. As counsel to area businesses, our team can evaluate the merits of an ADA claim and determine if changes to your place of business are warranted under the law. We can evaluate the merits of the claim, retain useful experts, and provide effective pre-trial guidance. Our team will also examine the history of both the claimant and their representatives to determine if they have a history of making unsupported claims since, sadly, there are repeat players who have a record of abusing the ADA for profit. At the Brod Law Firm, we will make every effort to resolve the claims early and cost-effectively. We are also always prepared to represent our business clients at trial should the need arise.

As San Francisco small business attorneys, the Brod Law Firm is committed to helping our clients achieve the results they expect in all business interactions. The recently reported resolution to a dispute between a large corporation and a smaller, local organization is a reminder that often the best result is one that avoids litigation. We will always be zealous advocates for our clients in court, but we are also committed to helping avoid trial whenever possible while still providing a positive result.

The Oakland Tribune recently reported on the successful resolution of a dispute between Kellogg Company and Maya Archaeology Initiative (“MAI”), a small organization based in Walnut Creek that seeks to protect the history and culture found in Northern Guatemala. Both the MAI and the Froot Loops line, owned by Kellogg, use a toucan in their logo. This overlap led to a dispute with Kellogg’s legal team demanding that MAI stop using the toucan symbol, suggesting the logo was too similar to the Froot Loops toucan and violated the company’s trademark. This week, the organizations announced that the dispute had been resolved without litigation and that Kellogg would be contributing $100,000 to MAI’s initiatives. Further, Kellog agreed to promote knowledge of the Mayan culture on future cereal boxes and to include the web address for MAI.

As Oakland small business attorneys, we understand that the threat of a lawsuit is frightening to business owners. This is particularly true when the dispute pits a small, local organization against a very large corporation with access to greater financial resources. It is important for local business owners to seek counsel as soon as a potential dispute arises so that all options can be discussed. Our team is dedicated to pursuing all forms of dispute resolution on behalf of our small and medium sized business clients.

A California appeals court reaffirmed the state’s commitment to cracking down on distracted drivers in a ruling handed down on Monday. As the San Francisco Chronicle reported, the court found that cell phone use by drivers is a violation of the law, even if the driver is stopped at a traffic signal.

In the case at issue, the court upheld a fine levied against Carl Nelson who was ticketed for cell phone use while driving in Richmond in late 2009. Nelson contested the ticket, saying that the incident occurred at a stop light and that the law only applied to a car in motion. The court disagreed, finding that the intent and language of the law against handheld phone usage does cover vehicles momentarily stopped on the road, sending a message that distracted driving is a serious concern. The court did not rule on additional scenarios raised by the defense, such as placing a phone call when stuck for a long period of time due to an accident.

Before many other regions, California recognized the dangers posed by cell phone use. The California Vehicle Code section prohibiting the use of handheld telephones by all drivers went into effect in July 2008. Additional legislation effective January 2009 expanded the prohibition to texting while driving, including both reading and composing texts. Motorists under the age of 18 are also prohibited from using hands-free communication devices while operating a motor vehicle. Drivers over 18 are permitted to use hands-free phones as long as both ears are not covered by an earpiece. These rules are detailed in the Wireless Communications Device and Wireless Telephone Laws FAQs assembled by the Department of Motor Vehicles

The Oakland Tribune published a touching article this weekend sharing memories of an avid motorcycle buff who was killed in a collision with a car in October. Our Oakland motorcycle accident attorney knows that such accidents occur all too often and is dedicated to helping those impacted by the tragic incidents to pursue all remedies that the law allows. While no lawsuit can bring back a loved one or even restore an injured rider to their prior physical and emotional life, a skilled attorney can help ease the financial ramifications that often follow a motorcycle accident.

On October 23, 55 year-old Joseph Montoya was enjoying an autumn day with fellow riders. He was on his Yamaha 550 Seca, riding in the Castro Valley hills not far from the Redwood Road dirt park where he’d first learned to ride nearly four decades ago. The day turned tragic when a 19 year-old driver lost control of a Honda Accord, crossed into oncoming traffic, and hit Montoya who was killed instantly. The driver of the car was uninjured and an investigation by the California Highway Patrol is ongoing.

courthouse.jpgThe Tribune shares memories of Montoya’s family and friends who paint a picture of a true motorcycle aficionado who helped draw others to his favorite hobby. He also was a giving man, one who mentored others in his professional life and was known for distributing money to the homeless during the holiday season. The tribute is a reminder that Oakland motorcycle accident fatalities are not merely statistics but are a tragic end to full and meaningful lives of valued neighbors and loved ones. While recent reports indicate that the number of motorcycle fatalities has declined after a decade of increase (see the 2011 California Traffic Safety Report Card, focused on numbers from 2009) every fatality takes a very real life and deserves our attention.

It is important to remember that, after an accident, there are two legal systems that work to provide recourse to the victims and punish those at fault. At the same time as the police investigate potential criminal charges, a skilled Northern California motorcycle accident attorney can help surviving loved ones pursue civil law remedies. While criminal suits are brought by the state, a civil lawsuit is brought by the victim or by the family of the deceased. The systems have very different rules and different goals with the criminal system seeking to punish offenders and deter future violators while the civil system can help those impacted recover damages for their loss. No legal system can bring back a beloved individual, but alleviating the financial burden can allow the family to focus on healing without worrying about the economic impact of the loss.

It is important that those impacted by a motorcycle injury or a fatality seek out a legal expert with experience in similar cases. The determination of legal fault is often complex and requires a skilled attorney who understands the factors that a court will consider when evaluating a civil claim. The actions of the other driver, the conditions of the road at the time of the accident, the decisions made by the rider, and many other factors will come into play in a civil lawsuit arising out of a motorcycle accident.
Continue Reading ›

Our Sacramento car accident lawyer was please to read that a Sacramento jury spoke loudly against companies withholding safety information and applied California corporate negligence law when it imposed a $73 million penalty on Ford Motor Company on Thursday November 10, 2011. The verdict, reported in the Sacramento Bee is an example of the legal system operating to protect our citizens from corporations that may put their bottom lines over the public welfare.

The case against Ford arose out of a crash that killed two and injured two others. The victims were travelling in a van after performing as members of a church musical group. William Brownell, the driver of the van, and front-seat passenger Tony Mauro were killed when the van skidded and flipped three times as the vehicle entered Highway 9. Testimony indicated that the accident was the result of tread separation on the van’s Goodyear tires. Although Goodyear had informed Ford of the defect two years prior, Ford did not share this information with vehicle owners, perhaps because the company was still dealing with the financial fallout from a prior $2 billion tire recall.

car%20accident.jpgThe verdict, believed by reporters to be the largest of its kind, is in addition to specific awards to the families of the deceased and to two others injured in the crash. The jury used California comparative negligence law to find that 59% of the fault fell on Ford Motors and this calculation did impact the injury and wrongful death awards. The reported testimony suggests that the two individuals who died in the crash were not wearing their seatbelts. While at one time a finding that the victims shared some fault might have entirely eliminated the potential for recovery on injury and wrongful death claims, the law now weighs the different factors involved and determines the degree of fault for all involved parties. The negligence of a victim can result in a reduced award but it no longer eliminates it entirely.

However, the reduction does not apply to the $73 million in punitive damages. This type of penalty is allowed under California Civil Code Section 3294 in certain cases when the evidence shows malice, oppression, or fraud by the defendant and is intended to punish the defendant and make an example of their poor actions. This Sacramento car accident lawsuit verdict serves to warn companies that they cannot act with disregard for human lives and public safety. Clearly, the jury felt that Ford knowingly withheld the recall information from the public, likely in order to protect the company’s reputation and profits, and that this blatant disregard for public safety was a key factor in the crash at issue. The verdict punishes Ford for this decision and warns other companies that similar actions will not be tolerated by the state of California.
Continue Reading ›

The killing of eight people in a San Francisco salon shocked and horrified people in our region and across the nation. On Monday, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that a second victim’s family has filed a civil suit against Scott Dekraii, the alleged shooter. As the news report indicates, the family of Christy Lee Wilson is seeking compensation for the loss of the mother and wife who was murdered while getting her hair styled at Salon Meritage in Seal Beach. The San Francisco salon shootings appear to have been targeted at Michelle Fournier, whose family has also filed a San Francisco wrongful death lawsuit against the accused shooter.

When a loved one is lost, the family is left in an emotional turmoil that few can even imagine. It is hard to think about the legal system in such trying times, but it is still important to contact a San Francisco wrongful death attorney to be sure your legal rights are fully protected. In these cases, the criminal justice system does operate to punish the offender but it cannot provide direct aid to the victim’s family. This is where a civil lawsuit under California wrongful death principles can be crucial. Although the lawsuit cannot bring back the loved relative, economic compensation can help the family concentrate on rebuilding with less worry about the financial impact of the loss. grief.jpg

California Civil Code Section 377.60 sets forth the list of individuals entitled to bring a wrongful death lawsuit. The lawsuit is most often brought by a spouse (or registered domestic partner) or a child but the law does allow other individuals to bring suit if no spouse or child exists. In many cases, a single lawsuit may be filed to join multiple claims that are tied to the death of one individual.

A civil lawsuit for wrongful death can encompass both direct economic costs of the death as well as monetary compensation for more intangible loss. “Pocket book” costs that are often part of a civil suit include the loss of the individual’s earnings (including benefits such as health insurance carried by the victim) as well as direct funeral and burial costs. These economic losses can also include the loss of the victim’s help with household duties, a factor that is especially important if the lost relative was a full-time parent or home-maker. California law also provides that the civil court can award damages for non-economic losses. Such losses can include the loss of love, moral support, companionship, sexual relations, and other losses of an emotional nature.
Continue Reading ›

Most parents view education as a key foundation for their child’s future. Californians send their children to school to learn and, in doing so, trust that their child will be safe while at school. However, recent threats received by personnel at schools in Martinez remind us that even school is not always a safe haven. While these threats did not result in any injury, any incident at a school requires an understanding of the law and the help of an attorney who understands California school safety laws. Our Oakland school injury attorney is well aware of the harm that can result when schools fails to act appropriately to keep students safe.

As The Oakland Tribune reported, the Martinez school district held a forum last week to discuss school safety and the response to threats to schools and students. This meeting was spurred by a series of events. In mid-October, a school employee received an email that included a threat against Alhambra High School. The school responded with an increase in security and notified parents on the day after the email was received. A week later, the school was placed on lockdown and parents were notified when an empty gun case was discovered in the high school auditorium. Further threats against two elementary schools arrived via separate letters later that week. In one case, the school was closed. In the other, the threatened school remained open and parents were not notified until the morning after the letter arrived. Police have arrested Larry Bantola on suspicions related to the series of threats. The Tribune reports that Bantola allegedly signed the name of a former friend to the notes. desks.jpg

Luckily, none of the threats in the Martinez area incidents resulted in any harm to students. However, parents should be aware that schools have a special duty to help protect their students. California education law requires that school districts develop and maintain a school safety plan that is aimed at preventing crime and violence on school property. These plans must be updated yearly. The State Board of Education further mandates that students have a right to safety in the school environment. Schools must have plans in place for conflict situations, including procedures for involving law enforcement when needed. School districts are specifically urged to collaborate with parents and guardians as well as other community groups and law enforcement authorities in order to ensure student safety. These rules are spelled out in both the state code and in California State Board of Education Policy 01-02.

“Fracking” is a process used in the exploration of natural gas where water and chemicals are hydraulically pumped into rocks deep beneath the ground surface. Claims have been made that water supplies can become contaminated by fracking, and water can even become flammable, as natural gas and toxic chemicals are released from the shale rock underground. In 2005, the Bush Administration’s Energy Bill exempted companies from disclosing the chemicals they use in the “fracking” process, and exempted natural gas drilling from the Safe Water Drinking Act, which was established in 1974. In 2009, the FRAC Act (Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness to Chemical Act) was introduced by the U.S. House of Representatives in an attempt to require companies to disclose the chemicals used in fracking. The FRAC Act essentially repealed the exemption from restrictions on hydraulic fracking of fluids near drinking water sources previously granted to oil and gas exploration, and required oil and gas companies to disclose the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing operations. While this is a start in environmental protection of clean water, it did not address the people and communities whose water supply may have become contaminated by this process.
Continue Reading ›

The San Francisco Chronicle reported on an incident at the Occupy Oakland protests that occurred Wednesday evening. The protests present a unique traffic hazard, but even in normal conditions car crashes involving pedestrians are not nearly as rare as one would hope. The incident serves as a reminder that anyone involved in an automobile-related injury in our area should always seek out a Northern California automobile accident attorney for advice.

According to news reports, a silver Mercedes-Benz struck two individuals involved in a march near the intersection of 11th and Broadway. The pedestrian protesters suffered non-life-threatening leg and ankle injuries and were taken to Highland Hospital. Police did question the driver, who does not appear to have been injured, and he was allowed to leave the scene. Witness accounts make it unclear whether the crash was an accident or a result of “road rage” with the driver acting on frustration and being provoked by other protesters. Early reports suggest that the driver did have a green light but that his car was blocked by the crowds.

truck%20accident%20speeding.jpgRegardless of political positions, this incident can serve as a reminder of the importance of involving a skilled Oakland personal injury attorney when a car accident occurs. As the Chronicle noted, there were conflicting reports from the many witnesses at the scene. This incident had a particularly volatile context, but emotions will always run high where cars and injured pedestrians are involved. Differing reports from eye-witnesses are common. It is important that anyone involved in an Oakland car accident seek the assistance of a lawyer as soon as possible. An attorney can help gather information while it is fresh and make sure that a complete investigation is undertaken. Early involvement is ideal since time can fade memories and make it more difficult to locate all relevant witnesses. While the police are often involved, they have limited time and resources. It is vital that an attorney be engaged who is dedicated to helping uncover the truth and advocate on behalf of those involved.

Last month The City sued the landlord of a Tenderloin apartment building for forcing tenants to live in substandard conditions such as bedbugs and with drug-dealing gang members keeping them “like prisoners in their own homes.” The public nuisance lawsuit claims the owner of a six-story, 88-unit apartment building at 245 Leavenworth St. Accoding to the lawsuit, the landlord kept the building in substandard conditions despite repeated violation notices since 2009. In addition garbage piled outside, mold and mildew, and a damaged elevator and apartment doors inside. The lawsuit also alleged that Wai allows the building to be used as a headquarters by members of a gang to sell drugs and conduct other criminal activity. According to sfexaminer.com, the continued defiance had left The City with no choice but to seek a court order to protect tenants and neighbors.

The lawsuit cites 13 separate police reports between 2009 and 2011 that refer to gang activity in the at the building and surrounding area. One reported incident involves a man who chased another man from his apartment after the man punched his fist through his window. The resident was then swarmed outside by at least 10 other males who punched him in the head and neck. The resident told police that the group regularly loitered outside the building and threatened residents. Four of the suspects were later identified as members of a gang. And another report documented the fear residents felt over leaving their homes because of the criminal activity and intimidation by the gang. Other reports noted sales of marijuana, hashish, oxycodone, crack cocaine and heroin in front of the property and on the block; violation of a stay-away order from the property by a suspect on felony probation; and assaults and drive-by shootings in the area by members of the gang.

Here at the Brod Law Firm we have over 10 years experience fighting for the rights of tenants who have faced living in substandard conditions. The stigma and frustration tenants go through can be unbearable at times, and we are able to take away some of that burden by helping them collect damages for their pain and suffering, and any lost wages or hospital bills for injuries they experienced due to substandard living, such as coping with a bed-bug infestation or black mold. Leases for apartment buildings include what is known as an implied warranty of habitability. Landlords must maintain these standard necessities for every unit their buildings. Any issues with a unit or building can result in breaches of habitability. Typically if one unit is having problems with bedbugs, mold or faulty plumbing, then there is high probability that the entire building is also affected by the same problems. If you live in a building with substandard habitability, you should contact our firm. We provide representation in San Francisco and throughout the Bay Area. We offer free consultations and work on a contingency basis, meaning we don’t ask for a fee unless a recovery is made.

Contact Information