Articles Posted in Trucking Accidents

A horrible motor vehicle accident in May of 2007 changed the life of a young man, forever, requiring him to need permanent and constant medical attention. A Santa Clara jury found that two truck drivers were responsible for the accident, one of whom was talking on his cell phone at the time of the accident. The truck driver who the jury found to be 60 percent at fault, denied causing the accident, and even denied contributing to the cause of the accident. The jury awarded more than $49 million in damages.

The failure to take responsibility for an accident is perhaps one of the most overlooked reasons why the California courts are bogged down with cases. While the proponents of “tort reform”, mostly backed by insurance companies, blame California juries for large verdicts, little is heard about jury verdicts, large or otherwise, occurring in the face of a total failure to assume responsibility. Often, it is not the wrongdoer, or even their attorney, who make the decision to force an injured person to go through a trial in court to have justice served, but the defendant’s insurance company. The insurance industry spends a great deal of money to ensure that everyone is familiar with the term “frivolous lawsuits”, but rarely are cases where a “frivolous defense” is raised, brought to the public’s attention. Cases like the one in Santa Clara County should send a message to insurance companies and to those responsible for causing injuries to others. Don’t think your conduct can cause serious injury to someone and get away with it in Santa Clara County.

Last week, U. S. House Representatives heard the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee denounce the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for not solving the problem of medically unfit truckers possessing fabricated medical certificates. The hearing focused on eight outstanding National Transportation Safety Board recommendations and many congressional mandates to ensure that commercial driver’s license holders are medically fit to drive. According to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, medical oversight of commercial drivers has been on the National Transportation Safety Board’s “Most Wanted” list since 2003. The FMCA requires Interstate Commercial Drivers to pass a comprehensive physical exam before obtaining a commercial drivers license and carry a medical card, which has been issued by a qualified medical examiner and proves the driver meets the medical requirements, at all times and produce it upon request by State and Federal Inspectors. After an extensive investigation the committee found that there is no practicable mechanism in place for inspectors to determine whether a certificate is valid. Out of the eight recommendations, one of the main focuses of improvement made by the committee was for enforcement authorities to develop a way to identify invalid medical certification during safety inspections and routine stops. The committee believes the flaws in the medical certification process can lead to increased highway fatalities and injuries for commercial vehicle drivers, their passengers, and the public.

We, the attorneys here at the Brod Law Firm, are relieved to read about House lawmakers examining and addressing the issue of medically unfit truck drivers. We like to think these efforts will help make our roads less dangerous and lower the number of commercial truck accidents. It should be pointed out, however, that the report put out by the Committee states that its results cannot be generalized to the commercial driver or the medical examiner population as a whole. We find this point very important, because we know that commercial drivers are always assumed as the guilty party in any accident in which they are involved. That being said, it is also important not to underestimate the report and its findings. We find it disappointing that some medical professionals may not always use their best judgment when issuing medical certificates. After reading this report, we wondered how this information might frighten or impact the public, and we hope it doesn’t stop them from getting in their cars as usual. Whatever the public feels about the subject, our advice to them remains ever constant: Always use caution when sharing the road with a commercial truck. And this information put out by the committee should make drivers even more aware of the potential dangers that exist when they share the road with a commercial truck.

We also like the advice given by automedia.com in an article titled “Big Rig Blues-Don’t let those trucks get you down“, as well as their reminder that “without big rigs and their cargo, 82 percent of the country’s communities would be without groceries and other goods.” The article points out another important fact, which is, according to the AAA Foundation for Traffic Study, 75 percent of all truck related incidents are car initiated. This means that accidents between big trucks and cars are not always the fault of the big trucks. Most importantly, this shows drivers of cars don’t always know how to drive around trucks. In summary, the advice they give is as follows:

Contact Information